Some Notes on Developing Policy and Law in Caribbean
Intellectual Property
By Abiola Inniss
In recent years, the Caribbean has been placed under a
considerable amount of pressure to comply with international regimen on
intellectual property rights.
This is in no small part the result of World Trade
Organization requirements that signatory countries to its agreements must also
become TRIPS compliant (WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights). There is also little question that the pressures result from
the movement of a world economy which is now heavily based on the creation and
use of technologies that are based on the internet and the digitization of
information. In this situation, data becomes a totally pliable commodity and
the demand for multimedia products continues to expand at a breathtaking rate.
Along with this comes the demand for greater protection of the intangibles
which fall into the category of intellectual property.
Some governments worldwide place prime importance on research,
development and innovation as an essential component of national development,
prime examples of which may be found in countries such as India, China, Singapore
and South Korea, and this list is by no means exhaustive of countries engaging
in this kind of activity.
Caribbean countries, on the other hand, have yet to explore
the possibilities of research, development and innovation and are on the
receiving end of developed technologies and all of the demands and restrictions
which come with them. This is an issue which I explored in the WIPO Journal
2012 , and
which is wide open for much further discussion and debate. It suffices to say
at this point that this lack of attention to an area of endeavor of such great
magnitude leaves the region in a position that is weak and disjointed and
subject to the whims and fancies of International power brokers in the area.
As a means of compensating for this insecurity, several
countries within the region, as elsewhere, have tried to comply with
international regimen on intellectual property rights such as the TRIPS
agreement. They have also begun to implement legislation which fits the
requirements set out under it to the point of going over and above them in what
are called TRIPS plus arrangements. The conception of these countries seems to
be that life will become much easier for them in their abilities to access much
needed resources and that the international community will deal with them in a
more reasonable and lenient manner.
There is no indication, however, that developed countries
are at all interested in the issues that concern developing countries to the
point of offering any concessions in this area. The constant debates and
battles to be heard in negotiations at international fora such as the United
Nations and the World Trade Organization are a clear indication of the
disinterested attitude.
Developing countries that attempt to comply with these
arrangements without careful consideration of the effects on their societies
have all but signed their collapse into a chaotic policy and legislative abyss.
There are several examples of countries in the developing world which have
fallen into this trap, Kenya is one such example. The Kenyan government has led
Africa in the area of IPRs and has put laws in place to comply with IP regimen,
only to find that its lack of policy planning has caused it to have to revisit
its laws and to do patchwork correction. According to a study done by Dr.
Patricia Kameri-Mbote[1],
there is little indication as yet of the extent to which these laws have
contributed to Kenya’s national development.
The creation of legislation which deals with IPRs and
compliance with international regimen is a complex task that must be approached
from both scientific and social perspectives.The process must also investigate the deep-rooted
needs of societies for the development of their human resources, the
preservation of culture, and economic and social advancement.
This means that policy frameworks and policy must be developed which come from an understanding of the unique circumstances which envelop each
society, and legislation planned to suit. Caribbean countries intent upon
legislative compliance must consider whether their short-term goals of
appearing to be up to date with international rules will at all benefit the
longer term viability of their economic and social development. It cannot be
overemphasized that the leadership of Caricom is quintessential in the creation
of Caribbean intellectual property policy guidance for its members.
[1] Dr Kameri-Mbote prepared a study titled
Intellectual Property Protection in Africa: An assessment of the status of laws,
Research and Policy Analysis on Intellectual Property Rights in Kenya (2005).
Retrieved from http://www.ielrc.org/content/w0502.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment