Sunday, August 2, 2009

Balancing the interests in Intellectual Property Law; possible solutions to the Guyanese dilemma.

The issue of copyright infringement of written materials, music and performances is seemingly an everyday occurrence in Guyana, of which illegality ,notice is taken sporadically by the public when a specific complaint is made by a group, company or an individual seeking to protect their investment .At any other time it becomes a non issue in the face of the inadequacy of the law (both legislation and enforcement)to address the problem; this coupled with the lack of any properly organised focus group on intellectual property rights at both the legislative and the civil society levels, creates the environment most suitable for bootlegging to flourish and to expand by principle to other areas of endeavour ,as may be found in the example of the internet telephony issue which now occupies a place in the current newspapers. The issues of the infringement of patents, trademarks and passing off also regularly engage the attention of legal practitioners and the courts in which they may become caught in the snag of the now legendary backlog of cases, because of technical legal or administrative reasons.

The legal intricacies of the subject area which are useful and necessary for proper academic discourse, such as the Jurisprudence of Intellectual Property Law ,are considered to be cumbersome for the purposes of this short exposition which seeks to highlight the pertinent issues and to make some proposals as to how they may be addressed ,in a manner which might be appreciated by all interested parties. Reference will be made to case law and legislation as necessary.
It is a truism that law in society can only function effectively where there is a suitable balance between the interests of the citizens and the requirements at law, and that such a balance may only be attained by careful consideration of the contemporary challenges and requisites for living in that society along with the rules which must be applied in order that there should be regularity, and order .A reasonable level of contentment coming from a perception that justice is regularly satisfied is part of the reward of such a carefully considered application of seemingly commonsense principles; but which is scarcely the approach taken by legislators who seem as part of an historical attitude in some parts of the world, to adhere to the most pedantic and unproductive methods of creating rules which can fit the times and which may have some longevity in the regulation of society. The issue of legislation in relation to copyright ,patents and trademarks remains a sore issue in Guyana because it has not been properly addressed in a detailed and aggressive manner which includes the balance of the society’s interests. Such planned legislation must of necessity be subject to continuous assessment by a committee which will examine all of the aspects of modern Intellectual Property Law including the progressive use of Alternative Dispute Resolution as an inevitable part of an effective, modern system of justice dispensation.
There is little doubt that some areas of Intellectual Property Law continue to baffle lawyers who can struggle to find clear legal solutions to some issues and who are sometimes put to task to inform their clients as to this state of affairs. This is quite common in cases where a product or service is designed to piggyback on their client’s reputation and which would seem to be a clear case of passing off or registered trade mark infringement .As fantastical sounding as these legal malfeasance may be ,the most recognised method of dealing with this problem does not fall to any specific remedy in the legislation but must be dealt with through passing off in Tort, which is itself a common law remedy and which requires the test of look and feel. In these circumstances it is not unusual that the competitor will have made the product sufficiently different in these areas to avoid the clutches of the passing off remedy in Tort or Trade mark infringement and so may skip merrily away to continue the wrongdoing. Additional effective arguments may be made by the copycat to the effect that the brand name and other features make it distinctive from the complainant’s. Guyana does not have any recent Trademark legislation which may guide any infringement of trademarks in our modern circumstances and so a suitable reference for this discussion is found in the Trade Marks Act of 1994 of England. This Act allows for the registration of a trademark to include names, slogans and also inter alia, shapes and packaging, giving the brand name owner the opportunity to register the product packaging as a whole. The difficulty with this comes in the constant changes which will occur in packaging as response to the challenges of competition in both the local and global marketplace since the brand name owner may not find it either feasible or possible to continuously register the changes to the product’s packaging. The same issue may arise in reference to design protection. Where the question of a lookalike product arises the courts will apply the test which requires the claimant to establish a likelihood of confusion in assessment of trademark infringement, this requirement may be found at section 10(2) of the Trade Marks Act of 1994. This confusion may be held to include a likelihood of association but the case law in this area has also demonstrated the need to establish more than a mere “bringing to mind of the registered mark” as per Wagamama Limited v City Centre Restaurants [1995] PSR 715. Further, the test as to whether confusion has occurred is set down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as per Case C-2511/95 Sabel BV v Puma AG [1998] European Trade Marks Report 1. It was here established that a global assessment is required of all the relevant factors inclusive of the similarity of the marks, the goods and of the likelihood of confusion. It can be concluded that trademark registration is often of little assistance in the typical lookalike case since they almost always involve ‘initial interest confusion’ or /and cues or subliminal messages. While the so called infringing product may send the customer the message that it is as good as the Branded product, this alone will serve to satisfy the section 10 (2)test of the 1994 Act. The United Kingdom is however, afforded some relief from the inadequacies of the law by the effective Unfair Commercial Practices Directive(Dir 2005/29/EC) ,implemented in December of 2007 which seeks to regulate matters concerning unfair business to consumer commercial practices in the internal market. This Directive provides wider and more principled protection against the manufacture and sale of lookalike products than does the common law of passing off in England and is allied to the relief currently allowed for trademark and design infringement. The Directive also seeks to make competition fairer, protect consumers and to harmonize the existing remedies under national law.
It is these principles coming from the EC Directive and which will combine with remedies and provisions of the 1994 Act which need to be adopted for the development of effective legislation in the areas of Commercial Practice Guyana, which will also need to cover patents and copyright infringement. At all times it will be necessary to consider the current needs and peculiarities of the Guyanese society and to develop some foresight as to the future developments in commercial law Caribbean wide and globally .This is especially important with the growth of ecommerce which will eventually take root in our corner of the world and for which we are woefully unprepared ,as there is no legal regulatory system in place to deal with ecommerce in Guyana. Across the Caribbean the situation is little better, being non-existent in some territories and of a piecemeal constitution in others.
Of immense importance in the development of legislation which will address this area of the law is the incorporation of Alternative Dispute Resolution as an integral means of resolving disputes related to Intellectual Property Rights alongside of and perhaps in preference to litigation. This is a useful mechanism which provides for the use of mediation and arbitration as fast , cost effective , and less painful methods of solving problems ;and which are used successfully in the United kingdom and The United States of America to resolve issues in every sphere of civil law with huge degrees of success. The mediation project of the Supreme Court of Guyana, may work over time to assist in the resolution of disputes within the general Civil law system, but without the use of arbitration as an integral part of the work of the Commercial Court and as an effective means of dispensing with the backlog of civil cases there is likely to remain considerable frustration and disillusionment with the delivery of justice.
The development of suitable legislation on Intellectual Property rights must therefore take place as a combined effort of academia, practitioners and all persons who hold an interest in the subject by use or production of materials which may have some form of Intellectual property rights attached to them. It is certainly to be hoped that academia will be invited to engage in any future process far more than has obtained in the past, so that our society may benefit from dedicated intellectual resources in this area.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks for the sharing this website. it is very useful professional knowledge. Great idea you know about company background.
    web application development

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your interest ,please pass on the weblog to all who might be interested wherever you are.

    Regards.

    ReplyDelete